Date: 20DEC07
Name: Casillero del Diablo
Label:
Winery: Concha Y Toro S.A.
Website: www.casillerodeldiable.com
Varietal: Carmenere – Rapel Valley – Chile
Vintage: 2006
Price: $8.99
Preface: none
Appearance: Dark purple, with brick red appearing only along the rim. Medium to full bodied, with quite a bit of what I would call sediment; I pulled the cork cleanly, so I don’t think it’s bits of cork floating around. The bottle sat after being opened for about 45 minutes.
Nose: Overwhelming nose of alcohol, with some hint of being corked present. I’ll reiterate that the nose is very hot, and I’m anticipating a substantial burn when I take my first sip. There’s some pepper coming through – hot pepper, not really what I would call spice, and a note of caramel. The bottle label claims “chocolate, coffee and spice…raspberries and blackberries.” I have to report I’m getting none of these, perhaps because the aroma of alcohol is drowning everything else out. I’ll try the same experiment I tried with the Los Cardos (take a whiff of the glass a few hours after I finish the wine, when the nose is more concentrated) and see if any of the claimed elements appear in the nose.
Taste: I will take a pass on this wine. Harsh tannins, very sour, bitter finish, nothing to recommend. To me this is not a drinkable wine. Very dry, with no balancing elements apparent. If I scored these wines, this would get the lowest score of any wine I’ve yet had, which would put it above even the Citra, which I wasn’t too fond of.
Tellings: The website for this Casillero del Diablo (Cellar of the Devil) at http://www.conchaytorousa.com/wines/diablo.html says that the varietal mix is 85% Carmenere, 10% Cabernet Sauvignon and 5% Syrah. The website also claims that this is a legendary wine, though not because of the taste. To keep the vineyard workers from sampling the wine, the vineyard founder, Don Melchor, started a rumor that the deepest and darkest of his cellars was the devil’s own cellar. It worked, according to the legend. It might have been the taste that kept the pilfering workers away, though.
I’m completely open to the idea that maybe I just don’t get it. Maybe this is actually a quite good wine that just isn’t suited to my palate. Perhaps in a few years I’ll be able to discern the fine qualities of this wine. Until then I’ll just call it like I see it; to that end, the sips I’m taking while writing aren’t nearly so bad. Maybe the comical bracing I do before each sip has something to do with that?
Searching the internet for reviews of this wine led me to unanimously positive reviews, with only a few hints of the “it’ll be great in a few years” type of faint praise. The reviewers mostly echoed the bottle copy and the website by discerning the same aromas in the nose as those listed, so I’m ostensibly the odd man out. I’m happy with that lot, but if my tastes and experience change, and maybe one because of the other, I’m happy with that, too.
Thank goodness for wives. My wife yet again is doing virtually all of the Christmas shopping for the family, which keeps me in good stead with friends and family. If left to my own devices, I’d barely remember it was Christmas at all. She does the planning, the shopping, the buying and, thankfully, the thank you cards afterwards. Thank goodness for wives.
9 responses so far ↓
LeBlanc // December 22, 2007 at 9:02 am |
My wife and I really enjoy this wine. And I agree, thank goodness for wives to keep my life running properly.
slofox // January 7, 2008 at 5:58 pm |
Your review suggests to me that indeed your bottle was corked. I have tasted this wine myself and have sold it to many customers, none of whom have criticised it – indeed I have had many repeat sales and have had only positive feedback. Try another bottle and see if it is not better.
Caroline // March 14, 2008 at 6:58 pm |
I’m from Venezuela and I just bought the same wine, which presents the same aroma-taste-overall sensations and the first thing that popped to my nose when I uncorked the wine was indeed a corky smell, but the cork itself was purple tinted and smelling very fruity and fresh.
Though I can still fell a fruity hint on the “outside” and after a while the strong coffee aroma with another hint of cocoa, the stronger overall feeling is of “old leather and wood”.
Maybe it’s indeed “corked”, or maybe the flavor needs a while to develop, I find it very heavy and dry but in the end it bursts a lot of different notes. I would say it feels “compact”.
Caroline // March 16, 2008 at 7:44 pm |
The Day After: Much better flavor indeed, no traces of cork or any bad taste. Maybe it only needs quite a while to stabilize…
Ryan Mitchell // April 7, 2008 at 4:23 pm |
Please eat some ginger to cleanse your palate and swish some water around your mouth, then spite. Taste the wine again and write something intelligent.
Anonymous // April 7, 2008 at 4:24 pm |
Spit,but your right
glam // April 7, 2008 at 4:25 pm |
spit, but you’re right
lghtwave // May 1, 2008 at 10:20 pm |
I sure had some strong tannin but wasn’t bad as the review here. Honestly, I liked it a lot. A little bitter finish I agree but it’s well balanced with other tastes.
Damion // June 7, 2008 at 3:53 pm |
I have actually had this wine. I was in Columbia South America. I paid a pretty penny for it also. Then I saw it at my local grocery store in Virginia for like 10 bucks or less.
http://www.cheapwinecritics.com/varietal/cabernet-sauvignon/casillero-del-diablo-carmenere-2006/#comments